Discussion:
Royal photos with disparate ages
(too old to reply)
Louis Epstein
2019-05-08 18:31:03 UTC
Permalink
Prince Philip (98 next month) has been photographed with the new heir
to the Royal Dukedom of Sussex (born this month).
That is perhaps a record age difference?

In looking up my earlier post of this title and its descendant thread
I find that Google Groups now blocks this newsgroup from view pending
an appeal by a non-existent person.

Not impressed with the nickname,patronymic,nothing else
naming of "Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor",
perhaps the racists are delighted they won't be
using a title for a child of mixed blood,
the modernists are happy as well...
traditionalists should be annoyed.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
Louis Epstein
2019-05-09 07:32:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Louis Epstein
Prince Philip (98 next month) has been photographed with the new heir
to the Royal Dukedom of Sussex (born this month).
That is perhaps a record age difference?
(If the infant attains his great-grandfather's current age he will
still be around (presumably as Duke of Sussex and cousin of the
Sovereign) in the year 2117).
Post by Louis Epstein
In looking up my earlier post of this title and its descendant thread
I find that Google Groups now blocks this newsgroup from view pending
an appeal by a non-existent person.
Not impressed with the nickname,patronymic,nothing else
naming of "Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor",
perhaps the racists are delighted they won't be
using a title for a child of mixed blood,
the modernists are happy as well...
traditionalists should be annoyed.
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
Graham Truesdale
2019-05-16 20:34:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Louis Epstein
Prince Philip (98 next month) has been photographed with the new heir
to the Royal Dukedom of Sussex (born this month).
That is perhaps a record age difference?
(If the infant attains his great-grandfather's current age he will
still be around (presumably as Duke of Sussex and cousin of the
Sovereign) in the year 2117).

Aleks - you are assuming a centenarian Sovereign?
Post by Louis Epstein
In looking up my earlier post of this title and its descendant thread
I find that Google Groups now blocks this newsgroup from view pending
an appeal by a non-existent person.
Not impressed with the nickname,patronymic,nothing else
naming of "Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor",
perhaps the racists are delighted they won't be
using a title for a child of mixed blood,
the modernists are happy as well...
traditionalists should be annoyed.
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
Louis Epstein
2019-05-16 22:44:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
Prince Philip (98 next month) has been photographed with the new heir
to the Royal Dukedom of Sussex (born this month).
That is perhaps a record age difference?
(If the infant attains his great-grandfather's current age he will
still be around (presumably as Duke of Sussex and cousin of the
Sovereign) in the year 2117).
Aleks
?
Post by Louis Epstein
- you are assuming a centenarian Sovereign?
I did not specify "first cousin",I allow for being a
cousin once (or even twice) removed...
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by Louis Epstein
In looking up my earlier post of this title and its descendant thread
I find that Google Groups now blocks this newsgroup from view pending
an appeal by a non-existent person.
Not impressed with the nickname,patronymic,nothing else
naming of "Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor",
perhaps the racists are delighted they won't be
using a title for a child of mixed blood,
the modernists are happy as well...
traditionalists should be annoyed.
-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
Loading...