Discussion:
Puzzled!
Add Reply
The Chief
2017-05-05 18:26:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?

Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Louis Epstein
2017-05-05 22:44:28 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Why haven't those who pretend the Royals don't work hard been deported to
countries laboring under the hellish ordeal of republican government?

Sincerely,
Angry at Tunbridge Wells

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
The Chief
2017-05-05 23:54:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Why haven't those who pretend the Royals don't work hard been deported to
countries laboring under the hellish ordeal of republican government?
Sincerely,
Angry at Tunbridge Wells
There is proof that they don't work. Workers are required to make NI contributions. Have Betty, Phil and Chuck made required NI payments? Don't think so!

- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Louis Epstein
2017-05-06 18:22:20 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Chief
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Why haven't those who pretend the Royals don't work hard been deported to
countries laboring under the hellish ordeal of republican government?
Sincerely,
Angry at Tunbridge Wells
There is proof that they don't work. Workers are required to make NI
contributions. Have Betty, Phil and Chuck made required NI payments?
Don't think so!
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Royals are not subject to requirements!

- Angry at Tunbridge Wells

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
The Chief
2017-05-07 02:00:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Why haven't those who pretend the Royals don't work hard been deported to
countries laboring under the hellish ordeal of republican government?
Sincerely,
Angry at Tunbridge Wells
There is proof that they don't work. Workers are required to make NI
contributions. Have Betty, Phil and Chuck made required NI payments?
Don't think so!
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Royals are not subject to requirements!
They certainly are. The law applies to everyone. A fact you know very well.

- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
o***@gmail.com
2017-05-07 14:04:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Seems like you must be easily puzzled and confused then.
o***@gmail.com
2017-05-07 14:06:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Seems like you're easily shocked and confused then!

And absolutely! The law applies to everyone... Even Royals (apart from the Queen).Not to mention republican heads of state, ambassadors...
Louis Epstein
2017-05-07 17:51:50 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Chief
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Why haven't those who pretend the Royals don't work hard been deported
to countries laboring under the hellish ordeal of republican government?
Sincerely,
Angry at Tunbridge Wells
There is proof that they don't work. Workers are required to make NI
contributions. Have Betty, Phil and Chuck made required NI payments?
Don't think so!
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Royals are not subject to requirements!
They certainly are. The law applies to everyone. A fact you know very well.
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
What a seditious blasphemy against the Sovereign who must be above the law
in order for the law to have any validity at all!

- Angry at Tunbridge Wells

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.
The Chief
2017-05-10 05:16:51 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
Post by Louis Epstein
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Why haven't those who pretend the Royals don't work hard been deported
to countries laboring under the hellish ordeal of republican government?
Sincerely,
Angry at Tunbridge Wells
There is proof that they don't work. Workers are required to make NI
contributions. Have Betty, Phil and Chuck made required NI payments?
Don't think so!
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
Royals are not subject to requirements!
They certainly are. The law applies to everyone. A fact you know very well.
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
What a seditious blasphemy against the Sovereign who must be above the law
in order for the law to have any validity at all!
- Angry at Tunbridge Wells
Codswallop.

- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
c***@yahoo.com
2017-05-15 22:44:42 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by The Chief
How can Phil be "retiring" when his last job was in 1952?
Sincerely,
- Angry of Tunbridge Wells
I thought the sovereign in the UK was irresponsible.

Loading...