Discussion:
Head of Armed Forces
Add Reply
c***@yahoo.com
2017-07-31 23:57:45 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and the others countries of which she is head of state?
Donald4564
2017-08-01 04:59:46 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.

Regards
Donald Binks
c***@hush.ai
2017-08-02 15:44:11 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and
the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense
except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.
George VI was in United Kingdom through the period 1939-1945.
How far did he function as supreme Commander of armed forces of United Kingdom and her colonies?
How did Elizabeth II function as supreme Commander of British armed forces in 1982?
The Chief
2017-08-02 20:15:37 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by c***@hush.ai
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and
the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense
except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.
George VI was in United Kingdom through the period 1939-1945.
How far did he function as supreme Commander of armed forces of United Kingdom and her colonies?
How did Elizabeth II function as supreme Commander of British armed forces in 1982?
Both passed on their instructions from their Supreme Commander, Beelzebub, as soon as they were received.

Regards,
The Chief
Donald4564
2017-08-02 21:23:06 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by c***@hush.ai
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and
the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense
except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.
George VI was in United Kingdom through the period 1939-1945.
How far did he function as supreme Commander of armed forces of United Kingdom and her colonies?
How did Elizabeth II function as supreme Commander of British armed forces in 1982?
In a Constitutional Monarchy, the position of the Sovereign is not to rule but to reign. The King or Queen have the right to receive briefings and also to give advice to their Ministers. It is therefore through the Government that the armed forces receive direction.

Regards
Donald Binks
The Chief
2017-08-03 03:20:15 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@hush.ai
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and
the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense
except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.
George VI was in United Kingdom through the period 1939-1945.
How far did he function as supreme Commander of armed forces of United Kingdom and her colonies?
How did Elizabeth II function as supreme Commander of British armed forces in 1982?
In a Constitutional Monarchy, the position of the Sovereign is not to rule but to reign. The King or Queen have the right to receive briefings and also to give advice to their Ministers. It is therefore through the Government that the armed forces receive direction.
Regards
Donald Binks
I think my interpretation is more accurate!

Regards,
The Chief
c***@hush.ai
2017-08-03 16:30:10 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by c***@hush.ai
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and
the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense
except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.
George VI was in United Kingdom through the period 1939-1945.
How far did he function as supreme Commander of armed forces of United
Kingdom and her colonies?
How did Elizabeth II function as supreme Commander of British armed forces in 1982?
In a Constitutional Monarchy, the position of the Sovereign is not to rule but > to reign. The King or Queen have the right to receive briefings and also to
give advice to their Ministers. It is therefore through the Government that
the armed forces receive direction.
Belgium was a constitutional monarchy in 1940. Yet King Leopold III surrendered on 28th of May, overruling Prime Minister Pierlot.
In 1940, it was not an irrelevant matter as to who had the authority to surrender on behalf of British armed forces.
The Chief
2017-08-04 00:15:12 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by c***@hush.ai
Post by c***@hush.ai
Post by Donald4564
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and
the others countries of which she is head of state?
I think that the Governor-General fulfills this role in the ordinary sense
except when Her Majesty is actually in the country herself.
George VI was in United Kingdom through the period 1939-1945.
How far did he function as supreme Commander of armed forces of United
Kingdom and her colonies?
How did Elizabeth II function as supreme Commander of British armed forces in 1982?
In a Constitutional Monarchy, the position of the Sovereign is not to rule but > to reign. The King or Queen have the right to receive briefings and also to
give advice to their Ministers. It is therefore through the Government that
the armed forces receive direction.
Belgium was a constitutional monarchy in 1940. Yet King Leopold III surrendered on 28th of May, overruling Prime Minister Pierlot.
In 1940, it was not an irrelevant matter as to who had the authority to surrender on behalf of British armed forces.
An act for which he paid with his throne. However, the King of the Belgians was the actual as opposed to nominal Commander in Chief of the Belgian army in 1940.

Regards,
The Chief

The Chief
2017-08-01 19:04:07 UTC
Reply
Permalink
Raw Message
Post by c***@yahoo.com
Is the Queen supreme Commander of the armed forces of Canada, Australia, and the others countries of which she is head of state?
Satan.

Regards,
The Chief
Loading...